Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Añadir filtros

Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 76(10): 1753-1760, 2023 05 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2309347

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Small sample sizes have limited prior studies' ability to capture severe COVID-19 outcomes, especially among Ad26.COV2.S vaccine recipients. This study of 18.9 million adults aged ≥18 years assessed relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) in three recipient cohorts: (1) primary Ad26.COV2.S vaccine and Ad26.COV2.S booster (2 Ad26.COV2.S), (2) primary Ad26.COV2.S vaccine and mRNA booster (Ad26.COV2.S+mRNA), (3) two doses of primary mRNA vaccine and mRNA booster (3 mRNA). METHODS: We analyzed two de-identified datasets linked using privacy-preserving record linkage (PPRL): insurance claims and retail pharmacy COVID-19 vaccination data. We assessed the presence of COVID-19 diagnosis during January 1-March 31, 2022 in: (1) any claim, (2) outpatient claim, (3) emergency department (ED) claim, (4) inpatient claim, and (5) inpatient claim with intensive care unit (ICU) admission. rVE for each outcome comparing three recipient cohorts (reference: two Ad26.COV2.S doses) was estimated from adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Compared with two Ad26.COV2.S doses, Ad26.COV2.S+mRNA and three mRNA doses were more effective against all COVID-19 outcomes, including 57% (95% CI: 52-62) and 62% (95% CI: 58-65) rVE against an ED visit; 44% (95% CI: 34-52) and 54% (95% CI: 48-59) rVE against hospitalization; and 48% (95% CI: 22-66) and 66% (95% CI: 53-75) rVE against ICU admission, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that Ad26.COV2.S + mRNA doses were as good as three doses of mRNA, and better than two doses of Ad26.COV2.S. Vaccination continues to be an important preventive measure for reducing the public health impact of COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Ad26COVS1 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Vacunación , ARN Mensajero
2.
European Journal of General Practice ; 29(1):3, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2288191

RESUMEN

Background: There is strong evidence regarding the efficacy and effectiveness of BNT162b2 vaccine in preventing symptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2 virus. There is a relative paucity of data regarding effectiveness in preventing asymptomatic infection. Research question: What is the real-world effectiveness of BNT162b2 vaccine in preventing symptomatic and asymptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2 virus? Methods: In this real-world observational study, we identified a subpopulation of individuals in a large health maintenance organisation who were repeatedly tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection by PCR. We included these individuals in the study cohort and compared those vaccinated with BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine to the unvaccinated ones. A positive SARSCoV- 2 PCR test result was used as the outcome. Follow-up period was from 1 January 2021 until 11 February 2021. Result(s): In the cohort, 6286 individuals were included. Seven days following the second vaccine dose, a rate of six positive PCR tests per 10,000 person-days was recorded, compared with a rate of 53 positive tests per 10,000 person-days for the unvaccinated group. The estimated vaccine effectiveness against infection with SARS-CoV-2 virus after two vaccine doses was 89% (95% confidence interval 82-94%). The estimated effectiveness two weeks following the first vaccine dose was 61% (95% confidence interval 49-71%). Conclusion(s): In this study, vaccination with BNT162b2 reduced infection rates among individuals who underwent screening by frequent SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing. Using a cohort of frequently tested individuals reduced the indication bias for the PCR testing, which enabled estimation of infection rates.

3.
Euro Surveill ; 27(18)2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1834267

RESUMEN

We compared vaccine effectiveness against severe COVID-19 between December 2021 and March 2022 when Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 were the dominating SARS-CoV-2 variants in Scania county, Sweden. Effectiveness remained above 80% after the transition from BA.1 to BA.2 among people with at least three vaccine doses but the point estimate decreased markedly to 54% among those with only two doses. Protection from prior infection was also lower after the transition to BA.2. Booster vaccination seems necessary to maintain sufficient protection.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Humanos , Suecia/epidemiología , Eficacia de las Vacunas
4.
Euro Surveill ; 27(9)2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1731712

RESUMEN

We compared the risk of severe COVID-19 during two periods 2021 and 2022 when Delta and Omicron, respectively, were the dominating virus variants in Scania county, Sweden. We adjusted for differences in sex, age, comorbidities, prior infection and vaccination. Risk of severe disease from Omicron was markedly lower among vaccinated cases. It was also lower among the unvaccinated but remained high (> 5%) for older people and middle-aged men with two or more comorbidities. Efforts to increase vaccination uptake should continue.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Anciano , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , Suecia/epidemiología , Vacunación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA